Why GPT is Great for Brainstorming but Not for Writing Entire Pieces

As a writer, I find it’s natural to hit creative roadblocks. Sometimes, I just need a spark to get the ideas flowing. This is where tools like ChatGPT come in handy. GPT, with its vast database and ability to mimic human language, can be an incredible tool to bounce ideas off. Whether you’re struggling to find the right phrase, searching for unique angles, or looking for topic inspiration, GPT can offer a fresh perspective. It’s like having a brainstorming partner available 24/7. Which in my case is maybe a bad idea…

However, while GPT is excellent for generating ideas and providing initial drafts, relying on it to write an entire piece is not the best approach. Here’s why:

First, GPT lacks true understanding. It’s a machine learning model trained on vast amounts of text, but it doesn’t comprehend what it’s writing. This means the content it produces can be factually inaccurate or contextually inappropriate. A writers ability to grasp nuances, fact-check, and inject their unique voice into the writing is irreplaceable and what undeniably lifts the piece.

Second, over-reliance on GPT can dilute originality. Every writer brings their own style and perspective to their work, and GPT, while versatile, can’t replicate the human experience or creative touch. Writing is more than just putting words on a page—it’s about crafting a narrative that resonates with readers, something a machine cannot do effectively.

Lastly, content produced solely by GPT risks being generic. The model pulls from existing data, so the final result might lack the depth and originality readers expect. Us writers should treat GPT as a creative assistant rather than a substitute, using it to kickstart our ideas but ensuring the final piece is authentically our own.